![]() The 2021 club, if adding a couple vets on one-year deals to fill holes, is still competitive in the NL Central, which seems like the plan. Rizzo, Baez and Bryant are set to be free agents, and it’s hard to see the Cubs signing more than one of them, unless their markets really collapse or league revenues don’t rebound. The bigger questions for the Cubs, discussed in my offseason outlooks, is what they’ll be in 2022. It’s unclear if there’s more cost-cutting to come, but indications are that this may have gotten the Cubs into a range that they can manage for 2021. The article’s a 4,000+ word opus and on ESPN+, so I thought I’d share a few relevant portions, with my comments. As always, we await developments.Īt, Kiley McDaniel posted a long analysis of this deal (and the Padres’ other trade with the Rays for Blake Snell), the reasons it was made, and a few thoughts on the prospects the Cubs received. If that actually happens - since Contreras’ 2021 salary is likely in the relatively affordable $6 million range - that would signal “rebuild” to me. There’s a rumor out there that Contreras is being shopped. Until we know the answer to those questions, I am not going to assume the team is beginning a rebuild. Is ownership simply going to pocket it? Or are the Cubs going to use this money (and the approximately $39 million saved on Darvish’s deal past 2021) to offer contract extensions to core players such as Willson Contreras, Javier Baez, Anthony Rizzo and Kris Bryant? What we’ve been arguing about for the last couple of days is what’s going to happen to this money. They also save $20 million not paid to Darvish in 2022 and $19 million not paid to Yu in 2023. Subtract from that the estimated $7 million they’ll have to pay Davies, and that’s about $30 million of savings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |